Universities train the elite for governance using specific methods – the Tavistock Method. The real Tavistock method is mind control and cultural programming, deliberately using trauma and torture to tear down and reprogram individuals and populations with futureshock and cultural deconstruction. Common danger increases anxiety and suggestibility to ideas and beliefs implanted as induced fear, anger or excitement.
This system maintains the status quo power structure. Interdependence has eroded into transnationalism and shared sovereignty, such as the European Union. The main actors include corporations, not just nation-states. Ideologies are no longer geographically-based.
Many would add secret societies among those who actually rule the world. Replaced by corporate PR, diplomacy has given way to monetary coercion. Terrorism is linked to non-state actors that threaten sovereignty and globalization, but the transnationals terror campaigns are far more impacting. Mass mind control is so pervasive most remain oblivious to repressive reality. Far from perfecting humanity, the weapon of psychological science has enslaved it with enforced conformity.
Mass psychology is first and foremost a political issue. With deep ties to the British Establishment and military, Tavistock’s vision and imperatives become self-fulfilling prophecies. Mastery of mass psychology is Tavistock’s forte and signature which can be seen throughout the sociopolitical landscape. Disinformation, misdirection and crystallizing public opinion complete the control equation of invisible or virtual government.
Tavistock Institute is the social puppetmaster, shaping political, social, educational, and economic ‘opinions’. Their psychological shock troops include psychiatrists, educators, intelligence and military personnel. Their specialty is command and control problems. Rand, Brookings Institute, and SRI are other key players. The A.K. Rice Institute is a US clone of Tavistock.
The conference culture with facilitators and consultants originated with Tavistock. “The Tavistock Primer” is an organizational Bible for group relations, including mythical or archetypal dynamics. When individuals gather, collective identity emerges.
Groups tend to behave “as if” certain assumptions are true. This assumption identity is never exhausted. Groups have overt and covert aspects, including fantasies, fears and doubts about power and authority. Ordinary people gain power by acting collectively.
The Tavistock method, developed in the ’40s by Wilfred Bion, capitalizes on treating the group as a collective entity. The group behaves as a system whose first goal is survival. Projection drives us to disown undesirable parts of ourselves.
Projection and Projective Identification are two social defense mechanisms. Key areas of learning include boundaries, authority, role and task. Redefining authority and leadership, as well as slogans are part of programming commonality of task, function and motivation.
Smaller thinktanks are networked together doing reasearch on every facet of American life. For the average individual, the future isn’t a chance to be new, but a chance to be had yet another time. However, the marks are finally wising up to covert policies aimed in their direction through education, media, medicine, business, technology and government.
Since 1920, Tavistock Clinic aims included psycholgocial warfare, social control, information control; and control of the hidden information environment. Practically, this means it has control mechanisms in academia, multimedia, intelligence, and medicine especially pharmaceuticals and mental health. In this toxic form, the mental health movement has meant just the opposite.
Tavistock Invented What You Should Believe
You have been “injected” in every phase of life with pre-formed beliefs about the nature of self, others and reality. Your mundane and spiritual experiences are contrived and controlled. There is no position you can occupy in the system without being affected. Now they want your genetic identity, as well. Crisis and transitions create confusion which makes us mentally vulnerable to imposed trance states.
The First waves from Tavistock were Freudian analysis and behavioral clinical psychology. R.D. Lang trained at the Institute. Kurt Lewin’s Group Dynamics led to the Human Potential Movement with Esalan and the transpersonal psychologies which describe generic categories for myth and religions and spiritual experience.
Lewin’s equation said behavior was a function of the person and the environment, so they exerted maximal control on both with social psychology. The individual exists in dynamic tension with a field of coexisting factors and forces. There are behaviorial differences in how we work out the tension between our self-image and the environment or ‘life space.’ All methods have heavy trance-forming and hypnotic transactions embedded within them. They carry the aura of the shaman and the “white coat” mystique of medicine.
With therapeutic authority, they define what is sick, divergent or deviant behavior, what is socially acceptable, and what is insane. This system, coupled with the beliefs of science builds consensus reality and generates a worldview or paradigm, which in turn controls individual beliefs, thoughts, emotions, feelings and behavior.
Jung’s Tavistock Lectures on Analytical Psychology provided a blueprint of the mind – psychological types, levels of the psyche and archetypes of the personal and collective unconscious. Knowledge of psychological types and the multi-layered psyche made categorized profiling of character types possible.
Jung’s theory of the complex made word association tests, biofeedback and lie detectors a reality applied to law enforcement and interrogation. Jung’s dream research was used to target iconic dream imagery that could be injected into media, advertising and beliefs. His theories of the Shadow, or collective adversary, and projection have been used to conjure up enemies and scapegoats.
This may never have been Jung’s explicit intent, but it is a concrete result and effect of his research under the Tavistock agenda, which sponsored him at the time. The deliberate exploitation of symbols and manipulation of archetypes, images and icons was born. It is the root of cults of personality and celebrity, as well as falsely so-called “reality TV.” Charisma, amplified rapport, is the secret force of mind control.
The Tavistock agenda identifies and creates macro-trends, such as the “New Left” and militant activism as counter point to Neocon manipulation through radical religious policies. In other words, it is a primary polarizing entity at work throughout all levels of society, playing both sides against the middle. It does even better creating outside Adversaries through propaganda and projection, such as the distracting wars on terror, drugs, poverty and cancer — all of which seem unresolvable. Viable solutions simply aren’t allowed and are actively suppressed.
A Rockefeller grant gave birth to the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London in 1947. Tavistock joined with Kurt Lewin’s Research Center for Group Dynamics (RCGD) at the University of Michigan the next year and begin disseminating human relations literature, relating theory to practice, including promotion of change, engineering consensus, mass persuasion, breakdown of cognitive structure, and overcoming resistance. [Historical details at www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/d…s122.htm and educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwo…t.shtml]
Tavistock sets national agendas as part of the global shadow government. It used covert techniques to sell the war with Germany, the state of Israel, the Domino Theory and the Cold War for financial gain. Deliberate creation of crisis is a primary tool of social engineering and global drama. Other networked thinktanks are its dissemination organ. They create peer pressure throughout all strata of society designed to break people down into consensus conformity.
Globalist Change Agents
Tavistock’s agenda is used to create and topple governments. Tavistock’s objective is to eventually control entire populations between the use of drugs and sophisticated mind control techniques, including group dynamics. Its range of disciplines include anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political science, psychoanalysis, psychology and sociology.
Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control. They are currently involved in a war of extermination on the small American farmer through usery and bankruptsy by giant land trusts.
Futurist programs identify discontinuities and emerging dilemmas. Discontinuities challenge business as usual and dilemmas demand new ways of thinking about complex problems. Together, discontinuities and dilemmas provide a vista of new practices and points of view that shape tomorrow’s organizations and today’s choices.
Tavistock determined human psychophysical “breaking points.” Following WW I, Tavistock Institute and Clinic were established in London. Originally, this was a well-intentioned program to find ways of preventing the mental horrors of WW I. Stress syndrome was then called “shell shock,” but is now termed PTSD. Sigmund Freud was the founding father of Tavistock methodology. Later, Tavistock commissioned The Tavistock Lectures by Carl Jung on the nature of the deep subconscious mind.
Over the years, the emphasis changed until there was a sinister slant to the research in eugenics, political and cultural engineering by the mid-1930’s. There are rumors of an earlier version of Tavistock, which trained Lenin, and later after WWI, Adolph Hitler.
With the outbreak of World War II, Tavistock operatives took effective control of the Psychological Warfare Directorate of the British Army, while its allied network in the United States embedded itself in the American psychological warfare apparatus, including the Committee on National Morale and the Strategic Bombing Survey.
By war’s end, the combined influence of Tavistock (which became the Tavistock Institute in 1947) and of the former Frankfurt School operatives, had created a cadre of “psychological shock troops,” as Rees called them, and “cultural warriors” numbering in the several thousands. Today that network numbers in the several millions around the world, and it is the single most important factor in determining the design and content of mass media product.http://american_almanac.tripod.com/warfare.htm
By WWII, Tavistock was a real MI 6 Agency and its stress-related techniques were well advanced. They knew how to relieve mental, and emotional pain and also amplify it, physically and psychologically. In fact, Tavistock’s recommendations for excessive use of force were used tragically by Winston Churchill in the terrifying fire bombing of Dresden and Hamburg.
Sigmund Freud was Tavistock’s “prophet” and first director, followed by his daughter, Anna. Tavistock programs were used to program the postwar leaders of Germany’s government, churches, schools, corporations, etc., from among the POWs who were easy to manipulate.
Research into the use of microwave weapons and their use for mind control began in 1950s at the Tavistock Institute, one of Britain’s leading psychiatric research establishments. The UK institute was researching into ways of mind controlling the British population without them knowing. It’s main US branch is in the University of Michigan. The same principles were used to create pop culture and counterculture, so even societal rebellion is a programmed trend to channel and discredit opposing energy.
Freud’s nephew, a principle at Tavistock Institute, Edward Bernays is the godfather of propaganda and the “engineered consent” of Madison Avenue. He took Freud’s principles of mass psychology and applied them to social exploitation, numbing and manipulation of the masses.
Popular culture is engineered to brainwash each of us from cradle to grave. Trends and megatrends are manufactured, engineered by corporations. Nothing happens in politics or society by accident.
The Nazi’s employed techniques outlined by Bernays in the book PROPAGANDA, and later brought them to the US under Operation Paperclip where they were picked up by CIA and subsequently morphed into mind control programs such as cyborg assassins and MK Ultra. Similar programs were instituted in the USSR around the same time. CIA also spreads propaganda across the entire political spectrum through founding and funding front organizations.
In the wake of the Enlightenment, the notion arose of an intellectual elite, a distinguished social stratum that can be traced far back into classical history. Elite classes of intellectuals or well-educated people emerged in most European countries.
The intelligentsia is a social class of people engaged in complex mental and creative labor directed to the development and dissemination of culture, encompassing intellectuals and social groups close to them (e.g., artists, mystics, psychologists, psychiatrists, scientists and teachers).Bohemians were the forerunner of what we can call the ‘psychedelic intelligentsia’ and today’s New Age spiritual fusion.
Utopian socialism is the philosophical root of modern socialist thought. Anyone can be a utopian socialist, but the trend emerged in the first quarter of the 19th century. From the mid-19th century onwards, the other branches of socialism overtook utopianism in popularity. But groups such as the Fabians continued working their strategic agendas behind the scenes of perpetual class struggle.
Societies are cyclic, always in a continual process of constructing themselves and destructing from within. Utopian socialists are forerunners of communal hippie life, intentional communities and cooperatives. Utopian nostalgia is exemplified in the Star Trek and Star Wars philosophy. Its dystopian reflection is The Matrix, the postmodern Brave New World where nothing is believable or trustable.
Quasi-socialist intellectuals created hypothetical visions of perfect egalitarian and communal societies without actually concerning themselves with the manner in which these societies could be sustained. Yet, they shared a dream, which for the world at large has become a mind control nightmare.
The Occult Revival
Theosophical studies cover the origin and development of the cosmos and human development in all the planes of being from its beginning to its end. It is a philosophy of process, transformation, and evolution toward an extraordinary human potential. Out of this Utopian and scientific socialism came Theosophy, British” guild” socialism, the Fabian Society, Bertrand Russell, H. G. Wells, Tavistock and iconoclast Aleister Crowley.
Aleister Crowley is an infamous occultist. Occultism has served as “an alternative account of the world, available to people dissatisfied with the orthodox view of things, scientifically and politically, since the late 18th century. Older than Theosophy with roots in kabbalah, Hermetics, and pantheism, Magick was a practical application of causing change to conform with will using similar principles. They both embrace the Hermetic Axiom: “As Above; So Below,” which reflects the identity of man as a microcosm.
The Cryptocracy, through economics and mass mind control is involved in the transformation or “alchemical processing” of mass consciousness by psychological mind manipulation. With the help of these foundations and secret societies, experiments in world shaping continue multimedia and military campaigns. The goal is social engineering — to seed and control megatrends so the masses live as controlled puppets – wage slaves — of the ruling elite.
Occult societies have a long tradition of influence peddling and providing covers for espionage. They are conduits of trust that transcend national borders and can cover a spy network. Naturally, occultists influenced one anothers’ beliefs, whether it was acknowledged or not.
Black intelligence ops, “Esoterics” has always been a department in most intelligence services. In MI6, it was called the Occult Bureau. The SS also had an Occult Bureau. The Watch were FDR’s supersecret team for occult countermeasures, arcane assassinations, paranormal and psychic investigation. After the war, The Watch redirected its interest to UFO phenomena.
- The Indirect Strategy Is Based upon Psychology and Human Nature.
- Communication Is the Cornerstone of the Indirect Strategy.
- The Indirect Strategy Requires Privileged Intelligence.
- The Indirect Strategy Is Flexible, Employing Attacks, Retreats, and Defensive Fighting Based upon Circumstances.
- The Indirect Strategy Employs Rapid Dominance to Defeat the Ultimate Enemy—Time.
- Deception Is at the Heart of the Indirect Strategy.
- The Indirect Strategy Seeks to Create a Turning Point or Moment That Determines the Winner and Loser.
The first and foremost principle is that the indirect strategy is a psychological operation (“psy-op” in military jargon) based upon understanding, predicting, and influencing human nature. Psy-ops include the manipulation of information, movements, and positioning to gain a strategic battlefield advantage before and during a war. On the battlefield, the mission of psy-ops is to cause the enemy to quit by inflicting mental and emotional trauma. The goal is to elevate the enemy’s combat fatigue and skepticism about winning because a halfhearted warrior is more than halfway to losing.
The second and third principles are based upon the elimination of the “fog of war,” the natural uncertainty and lack of knowledge that occur during the heat of battle. The word “war” is derived from the Frankish-German word werra, which means “confusion,” “discord,” or “strife.” The second principle is that effective communications are necessary to eliminate miscues and mistakes, while the third principle is that privileged intelligence is a requirement to win a war. Only through privileged intelligence can one determine the enemy’s position and find its weaknesses.
In battle, the only certainty is change. Constantly changing battle conditions require flexible tactics. A General’s success lies not only in his initial plan but in how he adapts his plans once the initial plan has become inconsequential. The fourth principle is tactical flexibility, knowing when to use the optimum maneuver—a surprise attack, calculated retreat, coordinated counterattack, or defensive position—at the appropriate time. The fifth principle acknowledges that time is the ultimate enemy. During a prolonged engagement, the relentless march of time depletes supplies, weapons, troops, and morale.
The sixth principle, that deception is at the heart of the indirect strategy, and the seventh principle, that every battle has a turning point, are intimately intertwined. The indirect strategy is based upon the creation of deceptions to confuse enemies. This confusion creates a critical turning point, causing enemies to lose momentum they can never regain. All wars can be broken down into three elements: grand strategy, battles, and battlefield maneuvers. The grand strategy is the overall approach to winning the war.
FREUD JUNG FALLOUT
Jung recounts that during his first visit with Freud in March, 1907, Minna Bernays, Freud’s wife’s sister, told him of her sexual intimacy with Freud. Specifically, Jung recalls that Minna Bernays “was very much bothered by her relationship with Freud and felt guilty about it. From her I learned that Freud was in love with her and that their relationship was indeed very intimate. It was a shocking discovery for me, and even now (May, 1957) I can recall the agony I felt at the time” (Billinsky, 1969, p.42).
In his interview with Billinsky (1969, p. 42), Jung recalls, “Freud had some dreams that bothered him very much. The dreams were about the triangle–Freud, his wife and his wife’s younger sister. Freud had no idea I knew about the triangle and his intimate relationship with his sister-in-law. And so, when Freud told me about the dream…I asked (him) to tell me some of his personal associations…He looked at me with bitterness and said, ‘I could tell you more but I cannot risk my authority!'” Jung comments in his MEMOIRS (1963, p.158), “At that moment he lost it altogether. That sentence burned itself in my memory; and in it the end of our relationship was already foreshadowed.”
“Hitler was a British Agent” claims Hitler was programmed by Tavistock in 1912…
Greg Hallett’s book “Hitler Was A British Agent” depicts war as a ghoulish illusion conjured by occult magicians in order to degrade and eventually enslave humanity in world government.
Hallett’s claim that Hitler was a “British” agent is based on the testimony of a shadowy network of retired intelligence agents. While he fails to provide documentary proof, Hallett does offer persuasive circumstantial evidence.
For example, Adolph Hitler was in England in 1912-1913, a fact supported by his sister-in-law’s book: “The Memoirs of Bridget Hitler”(1979). Many historians including Hitler biographer John Toland have ignored this startling information. (If Hallett is right, historians like Toland are guilty of sanitizing Hitler and actually making him more credible than he was.)
Hallett says Hitler spent February to November 1912 being brainwashed and trained at the British Military Psych-Ops War School at Tavistock in Devon and in Ireland. “War machines need war and [that means they need] funded, trained and supported double agents to be their patsies, their puppets and their puppet enemies,” Hallett writes (38).
His sister-in-law describes Hitler as completely wasted when he arrived at her Liverpool home baggageless. “I had an idea he was ill, his colour was so bad and his eyes looked so peculiar,” she wrote. “He was always reading, not books, little pamphlets printed in German. I don’t know what was in them nor exactly where they came from.” (pp. 29,35) Hallett says these were Tavistock training manuals.
“Hitler was a British Agent” is useful as an alternative paradigm. (Usually we cannot recognize truth because we have the wrong paradigm, i.e. our “education.”) When Hallett says “British”, he means Illuminati, the Masonic cult of super rich bankers who control an interlocking network of megacartels. This cult is based in the City of London but uses England and most nations and ideologies, as sock puppets in a the Punch and Judy show called modern history.
Hallett’s claim would clarify many improbable events in the Second World War. For example, why did Hitler let 335,000 Allied soldiers escape at Dunkirk? This quixotic gesture was explained as a peace overture, but surely England would have been more attentive if its army were in Nazi POW camps.
The Nazi triumph in Feb. 1940 was like a knock-out in the first round. The Illuminati did not intend for the match to end so soon, nor for the Nazis to win.
In the summer of 1940, when the Nazis were triumphant and Britain prostrate, Nazi Military Intelligence Chief (Abwehr) Admiral Wilhelm Canaris told Romanian Foreign Minister Prince Michael Sturdza to stay neutral because England would win the war. He also gave this message to Spanish dictator Franco.
Hallett’s theory also explains why Hitler, supposedly the arch enemy of Jewish bankers, acted like he didn’t know the Rothschilds controlled England (and America) when this was practically common knowledge. If Hitler were for real, he wouldn’t have tried to accommodate these countries. England would have been invaded and conquered before Russia was attacked.
Hallett’s hypothesis explains 1)Why Hitler was able to expand into the Rhineland etc. without fear of retaliation. 2) Why the Nazi war machine was financed and built by the Bank of England and a Who’s Who of Anglo American corporations controlled by the Illuminati. 3) Why Hitler never sealed the Mediterranean at Gibraltar; and why the Spanish dictator Franco remained neutral, despite the huge debt he owed the Nazis from the Civil War. 4) Why I.G. Farben headquarters in Frankfurt was never bombed. This became CIA headquarters.
Coleman, John, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations
Cooke, Ben “The Tavistock’s Everday Use of Benzedrine…” Management and Organizational History, Vol. 4(2), 2009 http://moh.sagepub.com/cgi/pdf_extract/4/2/203
Corbett, Sara, “The Hoy Grail of the Unconscious” http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/magazine/20jung-t.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2
Gray, John, Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and the Death of Utopia (Doubleday, 2007)
Gray, John, Heresies: Against Progress and Other Illusions (2004).
King, Chris, The Prisoner’s Dilemma” http://www.dhushara .com/paradoxhtm/ prisoners. htm
Wolf, L. “For Whom the Polls Toll” The American Almanac, May 5, 1997, http://american_almanac.tripod.com/polls.htm
Szafranki, Colonel Richard (1995) “A Theory of Information Warfare” http://www.airpower.au.af.mil/airchronicles/apj/apj95/spr95_files/szfran.htm
Trist, Eric, The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology” http://www.moderntimesworkplace.com/archives/ericsess/tavis1/tavis1.html